What Is Going On !

Three weeks ago I speculated that JotSpot, the user-friendly wiki swallowed by Google a year and a half ago would soon come out of hibernation, and Voila! here it is, rebranded as Google Sites. It is the first service only available as part of Google Apps (including the free version), although I had some difficulty accessing it. Under “Manage this Domain” I could add “Sites” as a new service, but it did not show up on my account as an accessible application.

When I typed sites.google.com to visit google sites it wanted me to sign up for Google Apps even though I was already logged in to my account. Of course trying to do so resulted in the error message:

“Google Apps for zoliblog.com has already been registered by your domain administrator. Please contact your admin directly to get access to Google Apps services.”

Catch 22. But there’s a solution: just type the direct URL (sites.google.com/a/yourdomain.com as default, or customize it to your liking) and you can get into Sites. I’m sure Google will soon add it to the Apps menu. (Sidenote: my old JotSpot account is still alive at name.jot.com).

Google no longer calls this a wiki, which I think is a good move. I previously wrote:

“Wikis have arrived when …you don’t even have to know what they are to use one. You don’t have to know you’re using a wiki, just happily type away, creating shareable content on the Web.”

I was discussing Wetpaint, the user friendly, wiki-less wiki there, and I think it’s smart of Google to follow that pattern… more later, but first, under the hood it is still a wiki, so let’s examine some of the wiki basics.

The interface is familiar from good old JotSpot (as a sidenote, the old JotSpot accounts are still alive at name.jot.com). There’s a basic wysiwyg editor, the Edit button is large and visible, and so is the New Page button. Good old JotSpot had several more ways of creating new pages, which are gone - perhaps for the best:

WikiWords or CamelCase: in old JotSpot anything you typed with embedded capitalization became a link to a page. As a relatively early wiki-user I liked it, as the easiest way to LinkAsYouThink. But in the Web 2.0 age we keep on bastardizing grammar writing EveryThingLikeThis, so more and more WikiWords had to be “unlinked”… too much confusion, especially for the new generation of mainstream users.
Linking to a shell-page before it’s created. This was a useful feature, even if we eliminate camelcase, I could use the “Link” icon, and mark up text as a link to a new sub-page, to be filled with content later. Again, this supports flow-thinking, or LinkAsYouThink, which I regret is gone.
The “New Page” button. This is the only remaining option in Google Sites, and I think the fact that it offers to pick a parent page (enforced hierarchy) is an improvement. No more orphan pages, yet relatively flexible hierarchy.
For those not too familiar with wiki terms, I discuss some of these concepts in more detail here: technically an article on SocialText 2.0, but I often make comparisons to JotSpot and Atlassian’s Confluence.

I’m glad to see Sites retained breadcrumbs for easier navigation, and they added sitemaps, a tree-style view of all your pages. This could be improved to allow for drag-and-drop style moving of the pages (changing the hierarchy), like Zoho Wiki does.

I’m surprised Sites still does not have inbound links: this is a critical feature for all wikis, whatever we call them. A wiki is all about associating pieces of information with each other, and the inbound link, also referred to as backlink shows you where the information on the current page is used elsewhere. The JotSpot tea half-recognized the importance of backlinks, as they were available as as a downloadable plugin on the Jot Development wiki, but never made it to the standard feature-set, and are apparently lost in the Google reincarnation, at least for now.

Attachment handling is as good as it was in the original JotSpot: it maintains previous versions, allows users to revert to earlier ones…etc. However, Google missed a huge chance here to by not offering to convert the attached documents to its own Google Docs style. This point takes us to the next level: stepping outside the boundaries of a standalone wiki and using it as a facility to pull together data created by other applications.

Last year I said after burying JotSpot for a year, Google can’t just release it as a wiki, instead:

…I hope that means they rethought everything and integrated JotSpot well into a number of offerings.

It could provide for much better document management than the current Docs &­ Spreadsheets UI.
It overlaps with Page Creator, also with the simplified version found in Google Groups - in fact Groups which is no longer just email lists but a rudimentary collaboration platform and JotSpot could very well be merged / integrated.
Finally JotSpot tried to provide primitive applications (spreadsheet, calendar..etc) all of which have a better Google counterpart, so one would hope they will be replaced, too.
Well, what’s the score on that prediction? Google Sites is a better replacement for Page Creator, Google ditched the JotSpot “apps”, replacing them with their own ones - so far 2 scores out of 3. As for document management.. well, I’d say half a score, or less. (Hey, that’s 2.5 out of 3)

You can somewhat integrate Google Docs (which includes documents, spreadsheets and presentations) by embedding them into any Google Sites page. You have to enter the specific URL though - why not just select from a list? Furthermore, your Google docs or spreadsheets have to be first made public and you have to use the public URL to embed them into Sites. Here’s my test site, showing first an error message, then the actual embedded spreadsheet, after I made it public.

The embedded docs appear properly in the saved page, but I can’t click on it, not even in Edit mode to get to the source. In fact in Edit mode all I see is a graphical placeholder for the embedded doc.

How about sharing / collaboration? As expected, your Sites can be:

private
public
shared with individual email id’s
shared with everyone within your domain
…and you can set view or edit options for all those levels. However, Google missed a big chance again. As a complete coincidence, it’s only yesterday that I raved about Zoho’s Group level sharing, half-announced in a fairly understated manner - hidden in a list of Zoho Writer enhancements. Well, Google already has a very good group facility: Google Groups, which started it’s life as a group discussion / forum system, but it gradually evolved into a decent collaboration platform. Once I have a “group” defined (i.e. the list of members), why doesn’t it become an entity I can share my wiki (sites) or docs with? When I invite users to share the wiki with, there’s an option to save the list as group, but I don’t know where it disappears, can not pull it up either within the wiki or gmail, or docs.

Finally there are gadgets, but if you read Dennis Howlett at ZDNet, gadgets might the feature you don’t want to touch with a ten-foot pole.

Summary: Nice to have Jotspot back (even if we did not get GSpot. ) Google now has a pretty good and easy web-page creator with some wiki features made user-friendly, and a half-hearted attempt at integrating the rest of the Apps empire using Sites. Perhaps they get it right in the next release.

Source: By Zoli Erdos of Zoli’s Blog

Tags: googlesites.com, googlesites, sites.google.com, sitesgoogle.com, google sites

For the first time in seven years, the bill that candidates promised they would pass if elected has made it farther in the legislature than ever before. Thursday, though, the House rejected the PAC to PAC bill that passed in the senate Wednesday. But, that’s not necessarily a bad thing. The bill was instead sent to a conference committee to work out the differences between the house version and the senate version.

A couple of the House members went to the mic to say they’re worried that the conference committee may not reach a compromise and the PAC to PAC bill will be killed again. Remember, this bill is about being able to follow the money a candidate receives.

The conference committee is made up of six members. There will be three from the House and those will include two democrats and one republican. The same is true for the senate. There will be three from the upper house and those also include two democrats and one republican. But, even with that mixture, there are legislators who fear the conference committee may kill the PAC to PAC bill.

Rep. James Thomas, (D) Selma said, “The Senate has modified it, as you well know. Made some changes that they think they could live with and I don’t think they’re fixing to back down one inch. So, we wind up not having the bill again this year.” However, the house sponsor of the bill, Rep. Jeff McLaughlin, (D) Guntersville disagrees. “That’s certainly not my intention. You’ll get any number of comments from any number of people about any piece of legislation particularly one that’s had as much attention as this one, but now the purpose of this conference committee is to genuinely sit down and work and try and get back to a tighter version of the bill.”

In order for the conference committee to reach a compromise it takes four votes. Two votes from the three house members and two from the three senate members. Some may think the two democrats from the house and the two from the senate will seal the deal, but remember the differences in the bill are between the house version and the senate’s.

The conference committee’s first meeting is expected to be next week and it has the rest of the session to reach a compromise which can last until May 19th.

Tags: pacwind, pac wind

The Hogan family is just full of drama these days.

We. Love. It.
Reports are surfacing that the Hulkster had an affair while he was still living with his wife, prompting the hulking Linda Hogan to file for divorce from him. A divorce that’s recently turned u-g-l-y .

But what makes it even more interesting is that dear old Hulk allegedly had an affair with a friend of his daughter Brooke. Scandalicious!!!

Christiane Plante, a 33 year old friend who worked with Brooke on her bomb of a 2006 album, has confessed about her affair.
Christiane states, “My relationship with Terry [Hulk Hogan] began at a time when Terry and Linda privately knew their marriage was ending. She had left him already, although no official papers had been filed. Terry is a good man, good father and a good friend, and he and I grew close at a time when he was going through a very difficult period. It seemed right then, but I know it was wrong.”

Bitch didn′t feel so wrong blabbing it all to a tabloid. Who cares about her reputation? We may all think she’s a homewrecking slut, but at least she got paid to talk!

“Having felt the guilt and pain build up, I gave a note to Brooke apologising for my actions,” adds whorish Christiane. “I will never be able to fully forgive myself for this. I have lost an amazing friend.”
The affair allegedly took place last year, while the family was still shooting their reality TV show and Hull and Linda had yet to split.
Apparently Brooke is so distraught, she has even posted this ominous entry on her official blog.

Thursday, February 21, 2008
hey….
Current mood: distressed
Category: Life
I’m going through one of the hardest issues i’ve ever had to deal with in my life…please keep me and my family in your prayers…. I’m continuing work in the studio… I’m sure my writing will reflect my state of mind at the moment. I need all the support i can get. thank you…
love you much,

Former wrestling champion Hulk Hogan cheated on his wife with a female family friend, according to a shocking new tabloid expose.

national inquirer

Tags: linda hogan, christiane plante, brooke hogan, lindahogan, hulk hogan, brookehogan, christianeplante, hulkhogan